Suzan Lamens vs Tatjana Maria Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W W L L
Form
W W L W W L L L L LH2H: Lamens 1 - 1 Maria
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Maria winning 3. The last match between Lamens and Maria was at the Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, Group F, 10-04-2025, Rubber 2, Clay with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 1 |
| Tatjana Maria | 1 |
Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, Group F(10-04-2025)
3
6
6
3
7
5
| Lamens | Stats | Maria |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (15-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (13-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 73 | Ranking | 80 |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 42 |
| 25 | Age | 37 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 23 |
| 58% (300-218) | Career Total W/L | 56% (653-518) |
| $426,753 | Career Prize Money | $2,699,997 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bublik VS Rublev PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Suzan Lamens
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 26 | Games Won | 28 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:14:32 | Average Match Time | 2:14:32 |
| 82% (120/147) | 1st Serve % | 59% (100/169) |
| 65% (70/107) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (71/100) |
| 47% (36/77) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (33/69) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
| 38% (65/169) | Return Points Win % | 42% (78/184) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tatjana Maria Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyra Caterina Grant
Player
Tatjana Maria
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Tatjana Maria
63%
(
82 of
131)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
3
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
45%
(
59 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
113
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Tatjana Maria
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
115%
(
60 of
52)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Tatjana Maria
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Hanna Chang
46%
(
29 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
12
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Chloe Paquet
53%
(
63 of
118)
1st Serve %
46%
(
67 of
147)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
16
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
47 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
65 of
147)
136
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Tatjana Maria
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (300/218) | Win/Loss | 56% (653/518) |
| 56% (664/521) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1466/1186) |
| 53% (5717/5072) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12572/11557) |
| 54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (216/211) |
| 61% (187/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (213/178) |
| 57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (156/93) |
| 14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (68/36) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 845 | Aces Total | 2805 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2447 | Total Double Faults | 2073 |
| 1:29:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 428.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.79 |
| 59% (18268/31021) | 1st Serve % | 56% (29333/51926) |
| 62% (11281/18221) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (19241/29313) |
| 43% (5469/12825) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10274/22634) |
| 51% (2100/4135) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2729/5943) |
| 48% (14961/31166) | Return Points Win % | 43% (22175/51030) |
| 25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 43% (44/59) |
| 40% (4/6) | Masters W/L | 40% (40/60) |
| 73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 50% (8/8) |
| 54% (27/23) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (138/182) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 66% (408/206) |
| 54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 83% (15/3) |
| 58% (297/514) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (640/1154) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (48/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (121/237) |
| 56% (85/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (155/327) |
| 91% (274/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (687/582) |
| 9% (274/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (687/104) |
| 21% (244/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (484/71) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
